User talk:Dwilus
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Dwilus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I work at a College/University, and was hoping to publish a page on Wikipedia. Creating my account, I was sad to see that the IP address was blocked. My IT department verified that we do not use a proxy, and came to the conclusion that we were blocked. This would make sense, as there are many individuals who are using the same internet connection and searching your site, which may lead to some red flags. Nevertheless, I would be happy to make a contribution to the site, and request that you remove the ban. My IP address is 192.136.67.2. Thank you for your time.
Decline reason:
When you created your account, your IP was not blocked so that isn't true. You could have written your article but didn't. Since you have access to other IP ranges, you may use those. As for 192.136.67.2, it is VPNtranet...yes, it is a proxy, apparent in its name, and will not be unblocked. Proxycheck.io, Teoh.io and IPQualityScore all report it as VPN/proxy and it is blocked as a colocation host.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome
[edit]
|
AfC notification: Draft:Hyperbolastic Functions has a new comment
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyperbolastic Functions (March 24)
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hyperbolastic Functions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hyperbolastic Functions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Dwilus!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
|
March 2020
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Hyperbolastic functions, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please don't add content based on your own deductions. When you add content, please add the source or sources that you summarised to write the content. Other editors shouldn't have to be guessing where you got the information from. RexxS (talk) 23:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing the source for your last edit. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
-
- Because the source was already cited in the following sentence, I did not see a need to cite it. I will be more mindful when editing the document. Your efforts in making this a publish-worthy article are much appreciated!
-
- Yes, it's true that having the same source for the next sentence lessens the need to cite that sentence. If the whole paragraph had been added in one edit, that would be an obvious assumption, but when you add a sentence in the middle of an existing paragraph, it's always best to add a cite at that time. They can always be consolidated to the end of the paragraph later if someone thinks the individual ones are unnecessary. Better to have too many citations than not enough. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 17:58, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)